Build your comparison
Blueberry Funded vs Funding Pipswhich prop firm deserves your challenge fee?
Quick verdict
Safer counterparty
Funding Pips
Faster payouts
Funding Pips
Better for smaller budgets
Funding Pips
Rule stability
Too close to call
Feature comparison
| Feature |  Blueberry Funded |  Funding Pips | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $40 | $29 | Funding Pips |
| Challenge model | 1-step, 2-step, instant | 1-step, 2-step, instant | Tie |
| Max funding | $2M | $2M | Tie |
| Max profit split | 90% | 100% | Funding Pips |
| Payouts | Bi-weekly | Weekly–monthly (your choice) | Tie |
| Track record | Established 2024 | Established 2022 | Funding Pips |
| Trader rating | New — no ratings yet | New — no ratings yet | Tie |
| Headquarters | 🇦🇺 Australia | 🇦🇪 United Arab Emirates | Tie |
| Overall score | 79 | 80 | Funding Pips |
Both firms are scored from our ongoing research — the score dials above update as new data and trader input land. Read the full breakdowns on the Blueberry Funded review and the Funding Pips review.
Blueberry Funded — strengths & weaknesses
Pros
- Backed by Blueberry Markets, an ASIC-regulated Australian broker with ~8 years of brokerage operation — real infrastructure behind the accounts
- Four platforms — MT4, MT5, TradeLocker and DXtrade — a wider choice than most rivals
- Raw spreads from ~0.1 pips with a flat forex/gold commission and zero commission on indices, commodities and crypto
- Broad evaluation menu: 1-Step, 2-Step, Rapid, Synthetic and instant funding, from a low entry price
- 80% split scaling to 90%, bi-weekly payouts with no withdrawal fees
- No time limit on most challenge tracks; news trading, EAs and weekend holding permitted with restrictions
Cons
- The funded entity is registered offshore in St. Vincent and the Grenadines — the ASIC regulation covers the affiliated broker, not the prop product
- Polarised Trustpilot sentiment and a volatile published score, with recurring funded-account breach complaints at payout time
- Young firm (2024) — the long-term payout track record is still forming
- Excludes several regions, including US, Australian, Russian and UAE residents
Funding Pips — strengths & weaknesses
Pros
- Among the cheapest entries in the industry — challenges from $29
- You choose the payout cycle: weekly, bi-weekly, on-demand or 100%-split monthly
- Largest verified review base in forex prop (61k+ Trustpilot) and $274M+ rewarded
- Four platforms: MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader and TradeLocker
Cons
- Funded-account news rule voids profits within ±5 minutes of high-impact events — a frequent dispute trigger
- The weekly payout cycle pays only 60% — reaching 90–100% means slower cycles or consistency rules
- US residents cannot register new accounts
- Master-account rules are stricter than the evaluation, which catches traders off guard
79
VS80
Not sold on either? Browse every firm ranked by research score and build your own head-to-head.
Compare more firms